Trump and Obama: What Has Changed Between Them on Homosexuality and Saudi Arabia?

By Julio Severo

The White House said last Tuesday that President Donald Trump will continue to enforce an Obama’s executive order granting special rights to homosexuals in the workplace, making it clear that such order will remain intact “at the direction” of Trump.

“President Donald J. Trump is determined to protect the rights of all Americans, including the LGBTQ community,” said a statement released by the White House. “President Trump continues to be respectful and supportive of LGBTQ rights, just as he was throughout the election.”

The White House said Trump is proud to have been the first GOP presidential candidate to mention the LGBTQ community in his nomination acceptance speech, “pledging then to protect the community from violence and oppression,” which is a commonly used language and euphemism to advance the gay agenda.

How it affects churches, we do not know, but if you have a Christian organization and you do not hire homosexuals or if you do not accommodate their immoral lifestyle and ideology, the Trump administration offers to you the same thing the Obama administration offered: no financial relationship. But punishment.

About Trump’s decision to keep Obama’s homosexualist order, Peter LaBarbera, president of Americans For Truth About Homosexuality (AFTAH), said,

“This is the first sign we have that President Trump will be triangulating on homosexuality versus abortion. As exhilarated as we were to watch the Trump administration confidently and boldly stand for the protection of the unborn at the March for Life, we are now deeply disappointed that Mr. Trump has chosen to defend false LGBTQ ‘rights’ based on changeable homosexual and gender-confused behaviors.”

He added,

“We condemned Obama when he advanced a sin-based agenda in the name of ‘Equality.’ We must do no less with President Trump.”

Pro-family leader Bryan Fischer remarked that with his decision to keep Obama’s order, “Trump bans Christian-run businesses who won’t affirm sexual deviancy from doing any work for federal government.”

The Trump administration has revealed hypocrisy in major points. If it is serious about the gay agenda as Obama was, why a normal relationship with Saudi Arabia, which murders homosexuals? The Obama administration condemned Christians opposed to the gay agenda, but had never condemned Saudi Arabia.

Last week Trump spoke by telephone with Saudi Arabia’s King Salman. He did not call him to condemn Saudi Arabia for murdering homosexuals. He called “to strengthen cooperation on fighting radical Islamic terrorism.”

Considering that Saudi Arabia is the main sponsor of the Islamic terrorism in the world, asking such Saudi help is akin to have Franklin Roosevelt asking Hitler to help America fight Nazism or have Ronald Reagan asking the Soviet Union to help America fight Soviet communism. It is illogical. It makes no sense.

In his call, Trump also “requested, and the Saudi king agreed to support, safe zones in Syria,” according to the DailyMail.

As admitted by the DailyMail, “Carving out safe havens in the civil war-torn Middle Eastern country would most likely require a massive deployment of US ground troops” in Syria.

For interventions in Syria, with Saudi support Obama deployed ISIS and Islamic rebels, who raped and murdered thousands Syrian Christians.

Now, with Saudi support, again, America under Trump wants to deploy thousands of American soldiers in Syria.

Because Obama and Trump never had any permission from the Syrian government to deploy troops in Syria, this is invasion.

Because the past U.S. administration created ISIS, which ravaged Syria, this is terrorism.

Because Saudi Arabia, which wants to help Trump in the invasion, is the main sponsor of the Islamic terrorism in the world, this is terrorism.

If Trump is serious about fighting Islamic terrorism, why did not he put Saudi Arabia in his black list?

If Trump is serious about helping Syrian refugees in alleged safe zones, why does not he ask the official permission from the Syrian government?

If he is serious about keeping Obama’s homosexualist decrees, why does not he condemn Saudi Arabia?

Besides, Obama imposed unfair sanctions against Russia, especially because Russia has an excellent law banning homosexual propaganda to children and adolescents. Trump has not reversed Obama’s sanctions.

Since the Obama administration, Russia has been a model against the gay agenda. As far as it depends on Trump, who seems not to want America reversing Obama’s homosexualist laws, Russia will continue to keep the leading position among Christian nations against the gay agenda.

Russia is in Syria helping Syrians, whose Christians are Orthodox as are Orthodox Christians Russians, because the Syrian government gave official permission for Russia to be in Syria. Anything less is invasion.

Trump is building a wall to protect U.S., and he deserves support on this. He is putting Islamic nations in his black list because he wants to protect the U.S.

But by keeping Saudi Arabia off his list and planning to invade Syria, he is inconsistent with conservative Christians and consistent with Obama and Hillary Clinton.

By keeping Obama’s homosexualist decrees he has the same inconsistency and consistency.

Saudi Arabia, which is an enemy of Syria, has no Christian community and bans Israelis from its territory. In contrast, Syria has one of the oldest Christian communities in the world. The Bible is not banned by the Syrian government. Saudi Arabia officially bans the Bible. Why had Obama a good relationship with Saudi Arabia, not Syria? Why has Trump a good relationship with Saudi Arabia, not Syria?

Why is Trump expressing a willingness to follow in Obama’s footsteps?

If Trump wants to “help” Syria, why call Saudi Arabia, the enemy of Syria?

If Trump does not want the U.S. invaded, why has he discussed with the Saudis about invading Syria?

Conservative Christians should not make the same mistake that they made regarding to former President George W. Bush. They supported him because of his pro-life stances. But they did not question him over his invasion of Iraq, which took a heavy toll on Iraqi Christians.

Conservative Christians liked Trump’s speech against neocons, but his stance on the gay agenda is not a good thing for America now and her future. And it is not good for the world, because America is an empire that guides the world as a model for better or worse.

Good Christians prophesied a good political administration for Trump. But what good will be if he does not choose to live prophetically such calling?

Trump has no conservative history, and he had connections with Obama and Hillary. His speech against neocons in his campaign was a fresh air of real conservatism, and the current pro-life stance of his administration is also a fresh air after eight years of the foul odor of the pro-abortion stances of the Obama administration.

Yet, by keeping the same homosexualist laws of Obama, including his illegal interference in Syria with Saudi assistance, Trump chose the same foul odor of left-wing radicals and neocons.

Let us hope he may change his course.

With information from the DailyMail and the Hill.

Portuguese version of this article: Trump e Obama: O que mudou entre eles sobre homossexualidade e Arábia Saudita?

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Holocaust, Abortion and Sodomy

Trump and Prophecies, and a New Model of National and World Leader

What Is Neoconservatism (Neocon)?

Trump and Prophecies, and a New Model of National and World Leader

By Julio Severo

There are some prophecies about President Donald Trump, and they are fascinating. “Trump shall become a trumpet, says the Lord,” the South African “singing prophet” Kim Clement bellowed in a recording reportedly made April 4, 2007, in Redding, California.

“Trump shall become a trumpet. I will raise up the Trump to become a trumpet. I will raise up the Trump to become a trumpet and Bill Gates to open up the gate of a financial realm for the church, says the Lord.”

Clement went on to say, or sing: “It shall come to pass that the man I place in the highest office shall go in whispering my name. But God said, when he enters into office, he will be shouting out by the power of the Spirit. For I shall fill him with my Spirit when he goes into office and there will be a praying man in the highest seat in your land.”

He said something similar, according to the recording, on Feb. 10, 2007: “There will be a praying president, not a religious one, for I will fool the people, says the Lord. I will fool the people, yes I will, God says, the one that is chosen shall go in and they shall say, ‘He has hot blood.’ For the Spirit of God says, yes, he may have hot blood, but he will bring the walls of protection on this country in a greater way and the economy of this country shall change rapidly, says the Lord of hosts.”

“Listen to the word of the Lord, God says, I will put at your helm for two terms a president that will pray, but he will not be a praying president when he starts,” Clement continued. “I will put him in office and then I will baptize him with the Holy Spirit and my power, says the Lord of hosts.”

Clement also prophesied about several other prominent people, but these prophecies have never been fulfilled. Can his prophecy about Trump come true? I do not know, but if his prophecy is real, my interpretation is that God is giving Trump a chance, as he gave Saul a chance. There is no harm in praying that Trump may use his God-given opportunity to do God’s will.

There are also other interesting prophecies about Trump. Stephen Powell, in a recent article in Charisma magazine, said he heard God’s voice saying:

I have chosen you Mr. Trump, and you will be a leader to many, not just of your people, but of the world. You will not just be seen, Mr. Trump, but you will be heard, for I have released a sound in you, and that sound shall be heard around the world. It will ring true and loud, and be like a shock wave in many countries.

As you honor Israel, I will honor you.

I have chosen Donald Trump to forerun a new model of national leader; yea, even a new form of world leader.

Actually, Trump’s speech against neocons was a breakthrough, a new model of leadership. No other American president has ever spoken so forcefully against neocons as Trump did in his political campaign. Will he fulfill the war he promised to wage against neocons? I do not know.

Are these prophecies about Trump trustworthy? I do not know. But there is no harm in praying that Trump may use his God-given opportunity to do God’s will.

I was ecstatic that the first action of President Donald Trump was to defund the International Planned Parenthood Federation, this vast machine of family planning, abortion and sex education. This is one of the evilest organizations in the world.

Christians, including me, rejoiced in the first big pro-life action by Trump.

Yet, George W. Bush took the exact same action in the first day of his administration. He defunded the International Planned Parenthood Federation.

Christians, including me, rejoiced in the first big pro-life action by Bush.

And, yes, there were wonderful prophecies about Bush.

Many years ago, Hank Kunneman said:

“After Clinton, I will raise up a man like David,” the Lord said. “A chosen man after My heart who will lead this nation in righteousness.”

I had a vision just before the 2000 election in which I saw the Lord remove Al Gore and place Bush in the White House. I prophesied about this publicly, so you can imagine my concern when newscasters initially announced that Gore had won. I wanted to hide!

“America will enter a season of war, but restoration has begun. I want this man seated for eight years, for as righteousness is seated, all things will be exposed.”

Prophets and their prophecies are never perfect. Even though we know now that Saudi Arabia is the main sponsor of international Islamic terrorism and that the ten terrorists who attacked the World Trade Center were Saudi Muslims, Kunneman said,

Like many churches, my congregation met to pray on September 11, 2001. While praying, I asked the Lord who was responsible for the attack. I then had a vision of a heart with the word “Afghanistan” written in the center. The words “Syria” and “Iraq” appeared around it.

Because Bush and Obama intervened in these nations, but did not help Christians persecuted in the aftermath of their bad decisions, the U.S. interventions resulted in total chaos for Christians.

The Iraq War was a humanitarian disaster for Christians. During his campaign, Donald Trump said that the Bush administration lied about his reasons to invade Iraq. Trump said that he opposed such invasion. Christians in Iraq took a very heavy toll for Bush’s bad decision. The Iraqi Christian community, which was over 2 million before the U.S. invasion, is now less than 400,000.

Bush had a very strong interest in the Iraq oil, but no interest in the Christian blood of Iraqis.

Neocons wanted the Iraq War, and they got it. They want the Syrian War, and under Obama they almost got it. And, of course, they want war with Russia.

Neocons represent war and disaster and even when an evangelical follows them, the result is always war and disaster.

The biggest mistake of evangelical Bush was to follow neocons. It was a disastrous mistake.

Evangelical Trump, praised by new prophecies, has condemned the Iraq War. And he has condemned neocons, who dominated in the Bush and Obama administrations.

The Trump chosen by prophecies condemned the Bush chosen by prophecies. In fact, Bush said that he did not vote for Trump.

People chosen by God through prophecies are imperfect. Prophets and their prophecies are imperfect.

Even though people and their ideologies (including theological ideologies) always change, God never changes. He was, He is and He will always be a prophetic God.

God chose Saul as king of Israel. But He needed to replace His own choice. Is He imperfect too? Very early in his kingship, or administration, Saul violated God’s will several times, and he was rejected. The chosen was rejected.

Does God know how to choose? Of course, He does! But free will is for everyone, including those chosen by God.

God replaced the loser Saul with David, who behaved rightly and wisely in the early years of his kingship. But the David administration was plagued, after his adultery, by several calamities, including a violent uprising led by one of his own sons.

God chose Saul, who by his own free will chose to be a loser by violating God’s will.

God replaced the chosen Saul with David, who did not lose his kingship, but lost much of his peace of mind and his people also lost much of their peace of mind by his adultery. His personal sin severely affected his administration and ability to rule in peace.

Just because a man is chosen by God does not mean that he will do everything right. Saul did not and was rejected. David also committed many mistakes, but he repented, and God chose to give him more chances.

If evangelical leaders who prophesied about Bush and Trump are false prophets, is God also a false god because He chose the loser and imperfect Saul?

If prophecies are correct, God wants Trump to be baptized in the Holy Spirit and become a praying president. There is no harm in praying that Trump may get these blessings.

There is no harm in praying that he may not imitate the calamitous mistakes of Bush.

And there is no harm in praying that God may protect him from the wicked influence and pressures from neocons, who inspired Bush to launch the Iraq War, which destroyed thousands of Christians in Iraq.

God can use Trump against neocons. And in this war, he will be a new model of national and world leader.

With information from WND (WorldNetDaily) and Charisma.

Portuguese version of this article: Trump e profecias, e um novo modelo de líder nacional e mundial

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Trump Welcomes Official Prayers from Protestant, Muslim, Jewish, Sikh, Mormon, Buddhist, Roman Catholic, Baha’i, Hindu and Native American Leaders at Protestant Cathedral in Washington DC

Trump to take the oath on two Bibles: the same Bible used by Abraham Lincoln, along with his own family Bible

It Is Official: White Evangelicals Gave Victory to Trump

Shifting U.S. policy to right, Trump chooses a pro-lifer and an anti-Islam, pro-Russian adviser

Trump and the Pope: a Right-Wing Populist (Today) Clashing with a Left-Wing Populist

Pro-Family Warmongers, Pro-Sodomy Neocons and Pro-Sodomy Non-Neocons: What Is Worse for Christians?

What Is Neoconservatism (Neocon)?

Trump, Obama, Hillary and NATO

Christians Are the Most Persecuted Religious Group in the World

Trump Welcomes Official Prayers from Protestant, Muslim, Jewish, Sikh, Mormon, Buddhist, Roman Catholic, Baha’i, Hindu and Native American Leaders at Protestant Cathedral in Washington DC

By Julio Severo

President Donald Trump attended the National Prayer Service at the Washington National Cathedral on Saturday with his family and Vice President Mike Pence. 

Interfaith service for Trump at the Washington National Cathedral

Trump arrived at the Protestant cathedral mid-morning. The service included prayers from Protestant, Muslim, Jewish, Sikh, Mormon, Buddhist, Roman Catholic, Baha’i, Hindu and Native American leaders, including readings from the Koran and other sacred books of these religious leaders.

The national prayer service is an inauguration tradition that dates back to George Washington, the first U.S. president. Yet, Washington received prayers and readings of the Bible only from Protestant ministers.

While a major Protestant cathedral in Washington, the capital city of the largest Protestant nation in the world, had Islamic leaders officially praying and reading the Koran to Trump, the largest mosque in Mecca, the Islamic world’s capital,  considers a sacrilege, worthy of death, for a Protestant minister to pray and read from the Bible for Saudi leaders in its facilities.

Even so, Islamic leaders can use their mosques and language to promote their ideology under the guise of interfaith dialogue, because they are allowed by the Koran to lie to advance their cause. But Christian leaders cannot use their churches and language to imply that religions save or help, because this is a brazen lie. Only Christ saves.

Muslim, Jewish, Sikh, Mormon, Buddhist, Roman Catholic, Baha’i, Hindu and Native American leaders can enter Christian churches to pray for their salvation, but they should never be allowed to take the stand to make official prayers and read from their religious books. Only the Bible should be allowed in a Christian pulpit.

The Washington National Cathedral committed against the Lord Jesus Christ a sacrilege that Mecca would never commit against its false prophet Mohammed.

Mecca would never accept the religious Babylon the Protestant cathedral in Washington has accepted.

Had George Washington envisioned America to become such Babylon? In fact, David Wilkerson had a vision about America as Babylon, and such is the reality indeed.

After a rendition of “How Great Thou Art” Trump led attendees at the cathedral, sitting at the time, in a standing ovation.

Muslim religious leaders also spoke at the service.

Executive Imam Mohamed Magid of the ADAMS Center in Sterling, Virginia led a Muslim call to prayer. Magid was a leader at the Islamic Society of North America from 2010 to 2014.

Mohamed Magid

Magid was followed by Sajid Tarar of Medina Masjid in Baltimore, Maryland who read a whole chapter of the Koran to Trump and other attendees.

Todd Christopherson, Quorum of the Twelve Apostles Mormon church delivered a prayer on behalf of the new president.

Donald Cardinal Wuerl, Catholic archbishop of Washington, D.C. said a prayer for the nation at the end of the ceremony.

Why has Trump welcome this Babylon of religions, which is typical for popes and the Vatican?

Trump, a Presbyterian, is not a regular churchgoer. He does not attend weekly services in New York, but every Christmas he attends a church near his estate in Palm Beach, Florida. Trump courted evangelical voters during the presidential campaign and infused his inaugural address with references to God and quoted from the Bible’s book of Psalms during a call for national unity.

The 106-year-old Washington National Cathedral has served as the spiritual center for the U.S. presidents, hosting funerals for Presidents Ronald Reagan and Gerald Ford.

In 2013, Rev. Gary Hall, dean of this cathedral, said that Christians should embrace religious “marriage equality,” a euphemism for gay “marriage.”

According to author Scott Lively, the Jewish tradition says that gay “marriage” was the last sin before the Great Flood.

With information from Associated Press, DailyMail and Breitbart.

Portuguese version of this article: Trump recebe com prazer rezas oficiais de líderes protestantes, muçulmanos, judeus, sikhs, mórmons, budistas, católicos, baha’is, hindus e indígenas americanos numa catedral protestante em Washington DC

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Trump to take the oath on two Bibles: the same Bible used by Abraham Lincoln, along with his own family Bible

It Is Official: White Evangelicals Gave Victory to Trump

Shifting U.S. policy to right, Trump chooses a pro-lifer and an anti-Islam, pro-Russian adviser

Trump and the Pope: a Right-Wing Populist (Today) Clashing with a Left-Wing Populist

Pro-Family Warmongers, Pro-Sodomy Neocons and Pro-Sodomy Non-Neocons: What Is Worse for Christians?

Manifest Destiny in the Bible? America Is Modern Babylon, Said David Wilkerson

Conservative Babylon in “Persecuted”: Hybrid Televangelist Framed by Pagan Neocon, and the Free Speech or Patriotic or Equality “Gospel” Replacing the Gospel of Jesus Christ

CIA concludes Russia intervened in the U.S. elections with the goal of helping Trump win

Individuals linked to the Russian government hacked both Democratic and Republican computer systems but only leaked information from Democratic officials, the CIA finds

By Julio Severo

The CIA has concluded that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help President-elect Donald Trump win the White House, according to reports in the Washington Post and the New York Times, which confirmed that Russia actively favored Trump.

Citing U.S. officials briefed on the matter, the Post said intelligence agencies had identified individuals with connections to the Russian government who provided thousands of hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee and others, including the chairman of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, to WikiLeaks.

The officials described the individuals as people known to the intelligence community who were part of a wider Russian operation to boost Trump and reduce Hillary’s chances of winning the election.

The hacked emails passed to WikiLeaks were a regular source of embarrassment to the Hillary campaign during the race for the presidency.

U.S. intelligence agencies also found that the Russians hacked the Republican National Committee’s computer systems as well, but did not release the information. This made the CIA conclude that Russia meant to promote Trump over Hillary.

“It is the assessment of the intelligence community that Russia’s goal here was to favor one candidate over the other, to help Trump get elected,” the Post quoted a senior U.S. official as saying. “That’s the consensus view.”

The CIA presented the growing evidence from multiple sources during a secret meeting with a number of senators last week, with agents saying it had become “quite clear” that the Russia was supporting a Trump victory, the Post reported. They said that Russia’s goal was electing Trump.

Trump’s team rejected the CIA’s findings on Friday, saying, “These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.”

This was a confused answer, because when former right-wing U.S. President George W. Bush said that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, most liberals, especially in media, said that there were no such weapons. In contrast, most right-wing and conservative groups sided with Bush. The most prominent leftist politician to stand with Bush was then senator Hillary Clinton.

Even though Trump’s team is dismissing any knowledge of a Russian interference in the U.S. elections to help him win, in his campaign last July Trump said, “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing.” He referred to emails on Hillary’s private server that she said she deleted. These messages involved the State Department affairs and their use in a private server constitutes crime.

Last October, Russian president Vladimir Putin was accused by U.S. government of plot to interfere in presidential election against Hillary Clinton and her party, and now the CIA has confirmed this accusation.

After all, was the Russian interference beneficial or not? From a leftist view, no, because Hillary lost. But from a conservative view, it was helpful, especially because both Trump and Putin have opposed left-wing billionaire George Soros and his organizations.

In fact, in one of the most powerful pro-family measures in our time, Putin has passed a ban against homosexual propaganda on children — a ban praised by Rev. Franklin Graham, president of the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, but condemned by Obama and other Western leaders. So it is no wonder that Putin was named “Person of the Year” in 2014 by The Advocate, the oldest homosexual magazine in the U.S. He was portrayed as the number 1 enemy of homosexual militants around the world just because he protected Russian children from homosexualists and their harmful propaganda.

The Russian opposition to the gay agenda has been a powerful motivation for Obama and his allies to fight Putin. In fact, Rev. Scott Lively has warned: “Obama Orchestrated Ukraine Coup to Re-Start Cold War and Prevent Russia from Leading Global Revolt Against LGBT Agenda.”

The Ukrainian crisis, ignited by George Soros and U.S. neocons, has been a convenient U.S. tool against Putin.

By interfering in the U.S. elections, Russia defeated Soros and his ally, Hillary Clinton, who was sure to advance neocon interests and the gay agenda in the U.S. and around the world. Her homosexual activism was no mystery. It was crystal-clear and tyrannical.

Trump is not a real conservative, and he has no conservative history, but he is relatively open to dialogue (an openness Hillary had not). Conservatives should take advantage of this openness to press Trump to abandon his bad decisions.

One of these bad decisions was Trump appointing homosexualist Peter Thiel, the PayPal founder, to help him choose people for his administration. 

Different from Hillary, who would choose only liberals for her administration, Trump has chosen liberals and conservatives. And he has also chosen neocons, whom he had promised to fight. He needs spiritual assistance to keep his promise on fighting neocons.

Putin’s Russia did a good action by helping Trump win. Conservatives’ good action would be to press Trump, among other goals, to do as Russia is doing: to protect children from the homosexual propaganda.

With information from Reuters, Haaretz and DailyMail.

Portuguese version of this article: CIA conclui que Rússia interveio nas eleições dos EUA com a meta de ajudar Trump a ganhar

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Vladimir Putin publicly accused by U.S. government of plot to interfere in presidential election against Hillary Clinton and her party

Shifting U.S. policy to right, Trump chooses a pro-lifer and an anti-Islam, pro-Russian adviser

It Is Official: White Evangelicals Gave Victory to Trump

What Is Neoconservatism (Neocon)?

Ronald Reagan: A Christian Example against Communism

Trump, Obama, Hillary and NATO

Olavo de Carvalho and His Nonsense on Trump and Russia

A Brazilian Neocon?

Left-Wing Billionaire George Soros and His Plan of Global Chaos

Top Anti-Russia Journalist Presents a Dossier Suggesting Trump May Be a Russian Agent

Former CIA director endorses Hillary Clinton, supports Muslims in CIA and characterizes Trump as Putin’s agent

A Trap for Trump

Russia Suspected in Cyber Attack on Campaign of Pro-Sodomy Hillary Clinton

Trump and the Pope: a Right-Wing Populist (Today) Clashing with a Left-Wing Populist

Putin Loves Hillary!

Is Trump a KGB Agent?

Shifting U.S. policy to right, Trump chooses a pro-lifer and an anti-Islam, pro-Russian adviser

By Julio Severo

President-elect Donald Trump signaled a sharp rightward shift in U.S. national security policy Friday by choosing Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions as attorney general and retired Lt. Gen Michael Flynn as his national security adviser.

Jeff Sessions and Michael Flynn

A former military intelligence chief, Flynn has accused the Obama administration of being too soft on terrorism and has said that Islam is a “political ideology” and driver of extremism. He sees Russia as a partner against the Islamic terrorism.

Trump’s initial decisions suggest a more aggressive military involvement in strategies against the Islamic terror and a greater emphasis on Islam’s role in stoking extremism.

Under left-wing President Barack Obama, U.S. foreign policy officials, including Hillary Clinton, focused on demonizing Russia by portraying Russia as the biggest threat and on fighting demonization of Islam by portraying Islam as a religion of peace. ISIS has made havoc among Christians and in the Russian borders. Trump has recognized that ISIS was created by Hillary. But Obama has antagonized Russia since Putin passed a law banning homosexual propaganda to children. This law eventually led the Obama administration to launch sanctions against Russia, even though Obama said that the sanctions were motivated by the Russian “invasion” of Crimea, a region traditionally Russian for 1,000 years.

Jeff Sessions is best known for his solid pro-life views. He has a 100% pro-life voting record according to the National Right to Life Committee and has consistently voted for pro-life legislation and in opposition to taxpayer funding of abortions.

Sessions, who will be the first pro-life attorney general since President George W Bush, said, “Our policies in this country as a nation should focus on life, should focus on decency, and focus on love for even the least of these.” He will bring to the Justice Department a consistently conservative voice.

Under pro-abortion Obama, pro-abortion Attorneys General have labeled pro-life advocates terrorists, went after pro-life people who peacefully protest outside abortion clinics, and refused to properly investigate and prosecute the Planned Parenthood abortion business for engaging in the sales of aborted baby body parts.

Of Trump’s new personnel picks, Michael Flynn will have the most direct access to the president. His role as a national security adviser will center on coordinating the policy positions of the secretaries of state, defense, justice and other members of a president’s national security team.

He is known in the military intelligence community as a smart professional and unconventional thinker. He was forced out of the Defense Intelligence Agency in 2014 because he disagreed with Obama’s approach, which was to focus on Russia, not on the Islamic terrorism.

In Flynn’s book, “The Field of Fight: How We Can Win the Global War Against Radical Islam and its Allies,” he condemned U.S. leaders who have called Islam a religion of peace. “This insistence on denying the existence of jihad led President Obama to the absurd claim that the Islamic State has nothing to do with Islam,” Flynn wrote.

In August, he called Islam a “cancer,” which is in line with Trump, who said in a CNN interview last March that “Islam hates us.”

In advising Trump’s campaign, Flynn has emphasized that the Islamic State poses an existential threat on a global scale. He shares Trump’s belief that Washington should work more closely with Moscow.

Flynn traveled last year to Moscow, where he joined Russian President Vladimir Putin and other Russian officials. His warmth toward Russia worries left-wing and neocon experts.

Trump’s warmth toward Russia also worries them. During his campaign, Trump was accused by neocons of being a “Russian agent.” The Trevor Loudon blog said,

“If Trump is elected, you will have the Russians… in the White House. Trump’s advisers are very connected to Vladimir Putin and Russia. Trump himself has many ties as well and is friends with Putin.”

Trump’s choices are definitely shifting U.S. policy to right. But while left-wingers are worried about Trump’s pro-life choices and both Republican and Democratic neocons are worried about Trump making Russia a partner against Islamic terrorism, conservative Christians are worried about his soft treatment of the gay ideology, especially his appointment of homosexualists, including Peter Thiel.

Trump’s two appointments — Sessions and Flynn — are a blow to two powerful industries in the United States: the abortion industry and the main neocon industry, the military-industrial complex. If Trump wants to be successful, he should not let the gay agenda industry untouched.

With information from the Associated Press and LifeNews.

Portuguese version of this article: Mudando a política dos EUA para a direita, Trump escolhe homem pró-vida e assessor anti-islamismo e pró-Rússia

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

It Is Official: White Evangelicals Gave Victory to Trump

What Is Neoconservatism (Neocon)?