Showing posts with label profanity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label profanity. Show all posts

Why Do Evangelicals Prefer Donald Trump to Hillary Clinton?


Why Do Evangelicals Prefer Donald Trump to Hillary Clinton?

By Julio Severo
Cracks have appeared in evangelical support for Donald Trump over the leak of a video containing his vulgar comments about women, even though backing from some of his most high-profile conservative Christian endorsers, such as Liberty University president Jerry Falwell Jr., is holding.
Among those reversing course is Wayne Grudem, a well-known non-cessationist Calvinist theologian. The prominent liberal evangelical magazine, Christianity Today, on Monday said Trump was “the very embodiment of what the Bible calls a fool.”
James Dobson, one of the most important pro-family leaders in the U.S., condemned Trump’s comments, but called Hillary Clinton’s abortion activism criminal.
“Mr. Trump promises to support religious liberty and the dignity of the unborn. Mrs. Clinton promises she will not,” Dobson said in a statement Monday.
Falwell Jr., an early endorser of the real estate magnate, said Trump’s remarks were “reprehensible.” Still, Falwell said, “we’re never going to have a perfect candidate,” and suggested the video leak was engineered by Trump’s enemies in his own party.
“I think it was timed,” Falwell told WABC-AM radio in New York. “I think it might have even been a conspiracy, you know, among the establishment Republicans who've known about it for weeks and who tried to time it to do the maximum damage.”
Trump has powerful enemies within the Republican Party, especially neocons, who are warmongers and love wars and military interventions. They insistently want war with Russia.
In the debate last Sunday, the moderator reminded Trump that his vice, Mike Pence, said that the U.S. should take an aggressive stand against Russia. Trump made publicly clear that he disagrees with Pence, by stressing: “Russia is fighting ISIS.”
Both the moderator and Hillary strongly pressed him in regard to Russia, but Trump resisted in his stance, which is different from Republicans and Democrats. They see Russia as the biggest threat. Trump sees ISIS as the biggest threat.
The GOP establishment is not satisfied with Trump’s different stances.
WND (WorldNetDaily), using Infowars as source, said that the video leak containing Trump’s private vulgar remarks was a plot of the Republican Party to sabotage Trump’s campaign. In short: Trump was betrayed by leaders of his own party.
But televangelist Pat Robertson dismissed Trump’s private vulgarities maliciously leaked, calling them an attempt by the candidate in the past to want “to look like he’s macho.”
On the video released Friday, Trump is heard uttering vulgar comments about women. Responding to the leak, Trump said that he was wrong to make those private comments.
Worse than private vulgar remarks by an American who has had support from conservative evangelicals is the behavior of some self-styled Brazilian conservatives who promote openly, daily and shamelessly vulgarities without never saying “I was wrong.”
Yet, in the U.S., which has not the accepted culture of vulgarity among conservatives as in Brazil, conservative Christian support for Trump has confounded those inside and outside evangelicalism. Trump, who was married three times, is a casino mogul. Early on, prominent evangelicals, including author Max Lucado, warned evangelicals against Trump over decency.
Even though a piggish mouth is a serious problem, could the public ignore Hillary’s bigger problems?
In a recent Pew Research Center survey, nearly 75 percent white evangelicals said that their major reason to prefer Trump is their dislike for Hillary. This aversion is largely over her abortion and sodomy activism.
In contrast with white evangelicals, AP reported that more than 6,000 Latino evangelical churches, including Brazilian churches, in the U.S. are endorsing Hillary, because of her policies favoring immigrants. They sold their ethical, moral and spiritual values for a socialist handout.
Because of immigration issue, the Catholic Church in the U.S. also thinks it is easier to back Hillary.
With the sabotage by the GOP establishment, it will be easier for evangelical immigrants to vote for Hillary by using as an excuse Trump’s vulgarities. Even Mormon Glen Beck, praised among conservatives, is encouraging this.
Should the focus be Trump’s indecent privacy, which he has already apologized for?
At a Liberty University congress Monday, Falwell put the focus on Hillary’s abortion and homosexual record, deeming it much more of a threat than Trump’s private vulgarities. Falwell said five years from now, “nobody is going to remember” what the Republican nominee said.
Yet, if Hillary is elected, everyone in the United States and around the world will pay a high cost for her aggressive abortion and sodomy agenda.
With information from Associated Press and WND (WorldNetDaily).
Recommended Reading:

Glenn Beck Says that Electing Hillary Clinton “Is a Moral, Ethical Choice”


Glenn Beck Says that Electing Hillary Clinton “Is a Moral, Ethical Choice”

By Julio Severo
The Blaze founder Glenn Beck, a Mormon who is very popular among American conservatives, last Saturday urged his followers to abandon support of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.
Hillary Clinton
“If the consequence of standing against Trump and for principles is indeed the election of Hillary Clinton, so be it. At least it is a moral, ethical choice,” Beck wrote.
Beck’s latest attack on Trump was in response to the release of a private vulgar comment by Trump 11 years ago.
Beck is lucky that he is not in Brazil, because some controversial Brazilian conservatives use vulgar and filthy language, not in a private form, but openly, allegedly to “spread conservatism,” and they are praised, not condemned. Perhaps the Brazilian conservative culture is more rotten than in America.
Yet, if Beck is offended by an old private vulgar comment by Trump, why is not he offended by the many public immoral stances of Hillary Clinton? Piggish language really deserves opposition, but such opposition should never be an excuse to support Hillary or another pro-abortion, pro-sodomy, socialist warmonger.
Glenn Beck
Beck’s opposition to Trump has been unrivaled in its vociferous invective. He regularly describes Trump as a Hitler-like psychopathwith supporters Beck has compared to Nazi Brownshirts.
Beck has also given high visibility to anti-Trump individuals, including Trevor Loudon, whose blog said, “If Trump is elected, you will have the Russians… in the White House. Trump’s advisers are very connected to Vladimir Putin and Russia. Trump himself has many ties as well and is friends with Putin. This is why Putin will try to sabotage Clinton with leaked emails, etc.”
With information from Breitbart.
Recommended Reading:

If Brazilian Immigrants in the U.S. Are Accused of Being “Pigs,” Why Blame Trump?


If Brazilian Immigrants in the U.S. Are Accused of Being “Pigs,” Why Blame Trump?

By Julio Severo
Brazilians, especially their immigrants in the United States, are receiving (and wildly spreading) an article titled, “Trump Says Brazilian Immigrants Are Latin Pigs.”
Veterans Memorial Stadium after a Brazilian festival
In the article, produced Oct. 6 by the Brazilian website “Brasil Verde Amarelo,” the Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump is quoted as saying that Brazilians look like Latin pigs, “messing up everything in front of them, they are so disorderly as the Brazilian economy.”
Many Brazilian evangelical immigrants, including ministers, were offended and upset by Trump’s alleged words and promised not to vote for him.
But Trump’s alleged offensive words against Brazilians are not, according to my Google search, his words, and probably were made up with the malicious intent to disaffect Brazilian immigrants from voting for Trump.
So Trump has no offensive words against Brazilians immigrants, who are really worried and “offended” for another reason: because Trump intends to restrict immigration.
Brazilian immigrants, and also many other immigrants, seem to see themselves as entitled to live in the United States and enjoy its affluence as if the U.S. were their house. So they want open borders for them, their relatives and friends.
But, what would they think about their own houses open? There is nothing wrong about it, if this is their choice. But what about if their friends or mere visitors said, “I like your house. I want to live here”? Even though they have a big desire to live in your house, it is not up for them to decide this. Only you can decide this.
An open house is an unsafe house.
An open nation is an unsafe nation.
Sadly, both leftist and conservative Brazilian immigrants appreciate very much open frontiers for the U.S. I understand left-wing Brazilians with such attitude. But why do even Brazilian conservative immigrants, who oppose socialism, appreciate a socialist policy of facilitated immigration for the U.S.?
Usually when the U.S. facilitates immigration, immigrants largely vote for U.S. socialists. This is the reason that U.S. socialists champion facilitated immigration for Brazilians and others.
Besides, there are cases of Brazilian immigrants who despise the U.S. and its Protestant culture. They despise the U.S. Christian culture, but they love the U.S affluence.
So probably the false accusations against Trump saying that Brazilian immigrants are pigs were produced by Brazilians discontent with his immigration ideas.
Yet, what about if Trump had really said that Brazilian immigrants are pigs? Would he have been wrong?
Last week, Brazilian immigrants were in U.S. headlines, including in CBS and Fox. They were bad headlines. These immigrants had a Brazilian festival in the Veterans Memorial Stadium in Lawrence, Mass., and they left the football field littered with trash.
According to CBS, “Mountains of empty beer cans, bottles, and food were left on the football field after the one-day festival.”
The Lawrence mayor said, “We’re disgusted, and just shocked that this would be left this way. We are shocked and dismayed at the level of uncleanliness they left it... the amount of damage...”
I am a Brazilian and I can say that even decent Brazilians would have a very hard time not calling these immigrants “pigs,” because their behavior was piggish.
So Trump would not be wrong if he had called them “pigs.”
Piggish is not limited to their behavior. Many Brazilians are foul-mouthed creatures. Americans were appalled and horrified by some past private vulgar words by Trump exposed recently. Americans are very, very lucky! In America they have a Republican who used privately vulgar language infrequently in the past, and he is being lambasted and criticized for it. In Brazil, there are self-styled conservative leaders who use very vulgar and crude language every day and abundantly on Facebook, and they are praised for their piggish language.
In Brazil, “pigs” are not confined to the Left. They are also abundant in the Right. And while Trump is apologizing for his past vulgar words, self-styled conservative leaders in Brazil, including Brazilian immigrants in the U.S., brag about their abundant daily vulgar and crude words. Even though Brazilian immigrants have no courage to use their filthy language among American conservatives, they spill them among Brazilian conservatives through Facebook.
One of these immigrants, Olavo de Carvalho, says to his Brazilian public on Facebook that the big disadvantage of U.S. conservatives is that they do not use filthy language. He said, “In the U.S. only the Left utters profanity. This is enough to explain why U.S. conservatives, even when they are the majority, are always disadvantaged.”
His hope, as a Brazilian immigrant in the U.S., is to change the U.S. conservative culture to accept filthy language as a tool to advance conservatism. He hopes also to deliver America from the “myth” of the Inquisition.
Many Brazilian immigrants are “pigs” and ignore it. But they are extremely offended and horrified if you call them according to their piggish behavior and language.
If Trump were in Brazil, he would have no need to apologize for any vulgar language. In fact, he could expand and use any crude and lewd words he wanted, even among “conservatives.”
But in the U.S., many Republicans and conservatives are asking Trump to quitfor his past filthy words. So should Brazilian immigrants leave the U.S. for their piggish behavior? Should self-styled Brazilian conservatives leave the Brazilian conservatism for importing from the Left the same piggish behavior and language?
If Brazilians, and their immigrants in the United States, are not “pigs,” why be offended by Trump’s alleged accusation against them? Why brag about piggish language?
Recommended Reading: