Showing posts with label immigration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label immigration. Show all posts

Jewish groups attack Trump over his ban on Islamic immigration


Jewish groups attack Trump over his ban on Islamic immigration

By Julio Severo
A new immigration order of President Donald Trump has drawn the outcry from a wide range of left-wing Jewish groups, because it went into effect on Friday, January 27, the anniversary when Soviet troops liberated Jews from the Nazi concentration camp in Auschwitz. 
The date is memorialized as the International Holocaust Remembrance Day.
“It is a terrible irony that today, the same day on which this order is to be signed, is also International Holocaust Remembrance Day,” the liberal Jewish group J Street said in a statement.   
“The fact that President Trump’s order appears designed to specifically limit the entry of Muslims evokes horrible memories among American Jews of the shameful period leading up to World War Two, when the United States failed to provide a safe haven for the vast majority of Jews in Europe trying to escape Nazi persecution,” the statement said. 
An irrational comparison, because Trump is not banning persecuted people. Under Obama, 99% of Syrians allowed into the U.S. were Muslims with 97% were Sunni Muslims last year. Sunni Muslims are responsible for 9-11 and every act of terror including Ft. Hood, San Bernardino, Orland, Paris, Brussels and Nice just to name a few, according to William Murray.
Syrian Christians, who are the real victims of persecution, including from the U.S.-created ISIS and the U.S.-trained rebels, were just 1% of Syrian immigrants allowed into the U.S.
For a rational comparison, it would make no sense the U.S. allowing 99% Nazi immigrants in 1940, when most persecuted people were Jews, and Nazi were oppressors. Christians in nations of Islamic majority are the new Jews.
Why should Jews today fight for Islamic immigration in the U.S. when Muslims persecute and torment Jews and Christians?
The doors of the United States have been wide open to the new Nazis, Muslims, while Christians in Islamic nations are treated as the Jews were treated in the Nazi era.
True Jews understand the similarity. Left-wing individuals, Jewish or not, do not understand.
Christians are suffering a Holocaust in several Islamic nations, with a yearly toll of 100,000 Christians martyrized, and are left-wing Jews worried about their oppressors not getting visas to the U.S.?
The U.S. has no obligation to take in refugees, Christians or not. But because the U.S. was greatly responsible for the war in Syria, by creating ISIS and funding and training the Islamic rebels, who persecuted and slaughtered Christians, the U.S. has an obligation and responsibility to take in Christian refugees.
Trump’s executive order declares that the U.S. will “prioritize refugee claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution.” That applies when “the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual’s country of nationality.”
Trump’s ban puts a 90-day pause on visas and immigration from seven countries including Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Iran, Libya, Yemen and Somalia. 
The order also puts a 120-day ban on all refugee entries into the country and declares that refugees from Syria are not welcome until further notice.  
The President Trump also addressed the topic of the Holocaust in a statement acknowledging Holocaust remembrance day.
“It is impossible to fully fathom the depravity and horror inflicted on innocent people by Nazi terror,” he said Friday. 
“In the name of the perished, I pledge to do everything in my power throughout my Presidency, and my life, to ensure that the forces of evil never again defeat the powers of good.”
With information from the DailyMail.
Recommended Reading:

Christians Are the Most Persecuted Religious Group in the World


Christians Are the Most Persecuted Religious Group in the World

By Julio Severo
Christians are the most persecuted religious group in the world, according to the Centre for Global Christianity.
Speaking on Vatican Radio, Massimo Introvigne, Director of the Centre for Studies on New Religions, said that around half a billion Christians in the world are unable to express their faith completely freely — with around 90,000 Christians who were killed for their faith in 2016 alone, which is the equivalent of one Christian being martyred every six minutes.
In March, the Chaldean Bishop of Aleppo reported that in just five years of conflict, the Christian population of Syria has been reduced by two thirds from 1.5 million to just 500,000, according to a Breitbart report
Many Syrian Christians were killed by ISIS, foundedby Hillary Clinton, or by Syrian rebels, funded, armed and trained by the Obama administration. While the Syrian government was fighting ISIS, the Obama administration was helping Islamic rebels who were essentially damaging the Syrian government’s war against ISIS.
Such reality puts the U.S. behind Islamic persecution of Christians. In fact, according to the 2016 World Watch List, published by Open Doors USA, even though North Korea is the number one in Christian persecution, the other countries that ranked highest on such persecution were Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq.
This is very bad news for the U.S., which has been militarily interfering in Syria and which invaded and intervened in Afghanistan and Iraq. The results are obviously appalling, at least for Christians.
In 2014, Raymond Ibrahim, author of the bestselling book “Crucified Again,” said in his article “Confirmed: U.S. Chief Facilitator of Christian Persecution”:
Whenever the U.S. intervenes in an Islamic nation, Islamists come to power. This is well demonstrated by the other three nations to which the U.S. brought “democracy” and where Christian minorities suffer “extreme persecution”:
Afghanistan: The supposedly “moderate” Karzai government installed by the U.S. upholds many of the draconian laws enforced by the Taliban—including the apostasy law, fiercely persecuting those who seek to convert to Christianity—and, in 2011, under U.S. auspices, it destroyed Afghanistan’s last Christian church.
Iraq: After the U.S. toppled Saddam Hussein, Christian minorities were savagely attacked and slaughtered, and dozens of their churches were bombed (see here for graphic images). Christians have been terrorized into near-extinction, with well over half of them fleeing Iraq.
Libya: Ever since U.S.-backed, al-Qaeda-linked terrorists overthrew Qaddafi, Christians—including Americans—have indeed suffered extreme persecution. Churches have been bombed; Christians have been torturedand killed (including for refusing to convert); and nuns have been threatened.
Surely a common theme emerges here: Where the U.S. works to oust secular autocrats, the quality of life for Christians and other minorities takes a major nosedive. Under Saddam, Qaddafi, and Assad, Christians and their churches were largely protected.
Ibrahim then says, “Prominent indicators confirm that the U.S. is the chief facilitator of the persecution of Christians around the world today.”
During his campaign, Donald Trump said that the administration of former President George W. Bush lied about his reasons to invade Iraq. Trump said that he opposed such invasion. Christians in Iraq took a very heavy toll for Bush’s bad decision. The Iraqi Christian community, which was over 2 million before the U.S. invasion, is now less than 400,000.
Under Bush and Obama, while Muslims in Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq had facilitated immigration to the U.S., Christians were essentially banned. Oppressors in, victims out. During his campaign, Trump promised to correct this incredible immigratory inconsistency by favoring Christian victims, not Islamic oppressors.
The U.S., founded by Christians, more specifically by Protestants, should give priority to persecuted Christian immigrants, but since some thirty years ago it has been giving priority to Muslims.
While Christians are the most persecuted religious group on the earth, Muslims are the main persecutors of Christians in the world. Why grant visas to persecutors, not their victims?
Let us pray that Trump may stop the trend of brutal persecution of Christians in the trail of U.S. interventions in Islamic nations.
With information from CBN and ChristianHeadlines.
Recommended Reading:

It Is Official: White Evangelicals Gave Victory to Trump


It Is Official: White Evangelicals Gave Victory to Trump

By Julio Severo
White evangelicals are doing a powerful difference in the United States. Thanks especially to them, Donald Trump is now the president of the United States. Thanks to them and their love of Israel, one of the first measures of Trump was to inviteIsraeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the U.S. for talks.
White evangelicals (including Pentecostals and charismatics) voted overwhelmingly for Donald Trump. According to the Washington Post, 81 percent of them chose Trump and just 16 percent chose Hillary.
In contrast, among traditional Protestants(Presbyterians, Lutherans, Methodists, etc.), 59 percent chose Hillary and just 35 chose Trump.
Among Catholics, 52 percent chose Trump and 45 percent chose Hillary.
Among Jews, 71 percent chose Hillary and just 24 percent chose Trump.
So WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was right when he saidthat evangelicals were the only “establishment” massively supporting Trump. But this support was not easy, because evangelicals were worried about his personal sexual behavior.
Trump’s candidacy led to divisions within different evangelical camps. The prominent evangelical theologian Wayne Grudem endorsed Trump, pulled back his endorsement and then re-endorsed him.
In spite of his personal moral weaknesses (which were not worse than the moral problems of Hillary and her husband Bill), Trump continued to receive support from major evangelical leaders, including Pat Robertson and Tony Perkins.
Even though Trump has always been a nominal Presbyterian, he and his vice-president have been receiving today personal regular advice, prayers and visits from evangelical, charismatic and Pentecostal leaders.
Trump’s support from white evangelicals could be explained by their deep dislike for Hillary’s pro-abortion and pro-sodomy activism.
Black evangelicals — who represent 2 in 5 evangelicals — also dislike Hillary’s activism. But, according to Christianity Today, they largely chose Hillary.
Among Latinos (including Brazilians), about 71 percent chose Hillary.
WND (WorldNetDaily) said that the impact and the growth of liberal-leaning minorities, mostly Latin American, will be felt in the next four decades.
According to WND, 2016 was the last presidential election where whites were a majority. In the next elections, they will be a minority, and the new majorities from other races and their liberal proclivities will prevail.
Massive immigration to America, brought by liberal politics, will have the expected effect against white evangelicals who are preserving and defending Christian conservatism in America.
If God does not intervene, this may be the last opportunity for white evangelicals make an impact for Jesus Christ in the U.S. government. For decades, American conservative evangelical presidents, including George W. Bush, promised to acknowledge Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, but they never fulfilled their promises.
If evangelicals encourage Trump to make this acknowledgement and transfer the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, God will move for these evangelicals, Trump and America.
The anticonservative strategy of the socialist opportunistic Democratic Party is to facilitate the immigration of liberals who will transform the majority of white evangelicals into a weakened minority.
But evangelicals have a strategic God. If this is the last chance for white evangelicals as a majority, they should work hard to use it in the best way possible.
Large families are one of God’s strategies. If evangelicals did not follow the contraceptive mindset, they would have larger families, who would keep their necessary majority and could resist for more decades the massive immigration of liberals.
God and large families are the only hope for conservative evangelicals in America.
With information from Washington Post, WND (WorldNetDaily), Christianity Today and The DailyBeast.
Recommended Reading:

If Brazilian Immigrants in the U.S. Are Accused of Being “Pigs,” Why Blame Trump?


If Brazilian Immigrants in the U.S. Are Accused of Being “Pigs,” Why Blame Trump?

By Julio Severo
Brazilians, especially their immigrants in the United States, are receiving (and wildly spreading) an article titled, “Trump Says Brazilian Immigrants Are Latin Pigs.”
Veterans Memorial Stadium after a Brazilian festival
In the article, produced Oct. 6 by the Brazilian website “Brasil Verde Amarelo,” the Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump is quoted as saying that Brazilians look like Latin pigs, “messing up everything in front of them, they are so disorderly as the Brazilian economy.”
Many Brazilian evangelical immigrants, including ministers, were offended and upset by Trump’s alleged words and promised not to vote for him.
But Trump’s alleged offensive words against Brazilians are not, according to my Google search, his words, and probably were made up with the malicious intent to disaffect Brazilian immigrants from voting for Trump.
So Trump has no offensive words against Brazilians immigrants, who are really worried and “offended” for another reason: because Trump intends to restrict immigration.
Brazilian immigrants, and also many other immigrants, seem to see themselves as entitled to live in the United States and enjoy its affluence as if the U.S. were their house. So they want open borders for them, their relatives and friends.
But, what would they think about their own houses open? There is nothing wrong about it, if this is their choice. But what about if their friends or mere visitors said, “I like your house. I want to live here”? Even though they have a big desire to live in your house, it is not up for them to decide this. Only you can decide this.
An open house is an unsafe house.
An open nation is an unsafe nation.
Sadly, both leftist and conservative Brazilian immigrants appreciate very much open frontiers for the U.S. I understand left-wing Brazilians with such attitude. But why do even Brazilian conservative immigrants, who oppose socialism, appreciate a socialist policy of facilitated immigration for the U.S.?
Usually when the U.S. facilitates immigration, immigrants largely vote for U.S. socialists. This is the reason that U.S. socialists champion facilitated immigration for Brazilians and others.
Besides, there are cases of Brazilian immigrants who despise the U.S. and its Protestant culture. They despise the U.S. Christian culture, but they love the U.S affluence.
So probably the false accusations against Trump saying that Brazilian immigrants are pigs were produced by Brazilians discontent with his immigration ideas.
Yet, what about if Trump had really said that Brazilian immigrants are pigs? Would he have been wrong?
Last week, Brazilian immigrants were in U.S. headlines, including in CBS and Fox. They were bad headlines. These immigrants had a Brazilian festival in the Veterans Memorial Stadium in Lawrence, Mass., and they left the football field littered with trash.
According to CBS, “Mountains of empty beer cans, bottles, and food were left on the football field after the one-day festival.”
The Lawrence mayor said, “We’re disgusted, and just shocked that this would be left this way. We are shocked and dismayed at the level of uncleanliness they left it... the amount of damage...”
I am a Brazilian and I can say that even decent Brazilians would have a very hard time not calling these immigrants “pigs,” because their behavior was piggish.
So Trump would not be wrong if he had called them “pigs.”
Piggish is not limited to their behavior. Many Brazilians are foul-mouthed creatures. Americans were appalled and horrified by some past private vulgar words by Trump exposed recently. Americans are very, very lucky! In America they have a Republican who used privately vulgar language infrequently in the past, and he is being lambasted and criticized for it. In Brazil, there are self-styled conservative leaders who use very vulgar and crude language every day and abundantly on Facebook, and they are praised for their piggish language.
In Brazil, “pigs” are not confined to the Left. They are also abundant in the Right. And while Trump is apologizing for his past vulgar words, self-styled conservative leaders in Brazil, including Brazilian immigrants in the U.S., brag about their abundant daily vulgar and crude words. Even though Brazilian immigrants have no courage to use their filthy language among American conservatives, they spill them among Brazilian conservatives through Facebook.
One of these immigrants, Olavo de Carvalho, says to his Brazilian public on Facebook that the big disadvantage of U.S. conservatives is that they do not use filthy language. He said, “In the U.S. only the Left utters profanity. This is enough to explain why U.S. conservatives, even when they are the majority, are always disadvantaged.”
His hope, as a Brazilian immigrant in the U.S., is to change the U.S. conservative culture to accept filthy language as a tool to advance conservatism. He hopes also to deliver America from the “myth” of the Inquisition.
Many Brazilian immigrants are “pigs” and ignore it. But they are extremely offended and horrified if you call them according to their piggish behavior and language.
If Trump were in Brazil, he would have no need to apologize for any vulgar language. In fact, he could expand and use any crude and lewd words he wanted, even among “conservatives.”
But in the U.S., many Republicans and conservatives are asking Trump to quitfor his past filthy words. So should Brazilian immigrants leave the U.S. for their piggish behavior? Should self-styled Brazilian conservatives leave the Brazilian conservatism for importing from the Left the same piggish behavior and language?
If Brazilians, and their immigrants in the United States, are not “pigs,” why be offended by Trump’s alleged accusation against them? Why brag about piggish language?
Recommended Reading:

Immigration: A Weapon of Mass Cultural Destruction in Liberal Hands


Immigration: A Weapon of Mass Cultural Destruction in Liberal Hands

By Julio Severo
It is a fact that conservatives in the United States are losing the culture war mainly through a massive immigration facilitated for decades by liberal policies. Democrats, who are essentially socialists, have a comfortable upper hand on immigration.
The typical answer from U.S. conservatives is to restrict some immigration. But, by then, America has already been flooded by immigrants who are largely contributing to the liberal project of cultural hegemony in the U.S.
By now, U.S. conservatives should have noticed and concluded that if liberals are winning by immigration, they should also use the same methods. Fire against fire.
If liberals are flooding America with Muslims and others who are helping their project, conservatives should also work a plan to flood America with immigrants. Not any immigrant, but real conservative immigrants. Ann Coulter noted that many Latin American Catholic immigrants, who are pro-life, are easily misled by Democrats and their socialist handouts. Usually, they love pro-life values. But they will vote for any candidate who gives them handouts, regardless of whether he is pro-abortion or not. This is not real conservatism.
To fit the ever-changing liberal population profile induced by mass immigration, conservatives and Republicans are increasingly espousing liberal ideas, methods and policies. Immigration is changing the way conservatives and Republicans think and behave politically. Because of the huge army of immigrants serving the Democratic Party, Republicans and their stances, especially their actions, are increasingly less conservative, while Democrats behave increasingly more liberal.
Conservatives who do not embrace the relativistic way of liberals suffer the consequences of irresponsible immigration aimed at making the Left, not America, strong.
An American-Jewish friend of mine told me that she lives in a very conservative county in Denver, which is receiving numerous Muslim immigrants, who are politically labeled as “refugees” by the Left. She said that UNC (University of Northern Colorado) began 2 years ago providing Halal (Islamic food) in all their cafeterias and that federal funding is linked to both immigration and transgender bathrooms. “So if the school districts want the federal funding they must abide by the laws,” she said.
Dr. William J. Murray, a former Marxist who today denounces the Marxist ideology, read my article, agreed and said, “Yes, conservatives helping conservatives immigrate would be good but… There are very few actual conservative churches left in America. Short answer: Good idea but the church will not help.”
Murray, who is the founder and director of Religious Freedom Coalition(a Washington DC-based Christian organization that helps persecuted Christians), also said, “We have done all we can to bring Christians in from Syria… this is the result: 99% of Syrians this year allowed in by Obama are Muslims with 97% being Sunni Muslims. Keep in mind that it is the Sunni Muslims who are responsible for 9-11 and every act of terror including Ft. Hood, San Bernardino, Orland, Paris, Brussels and Nice just to name a few.”
Murray was featured in my blog in 2015 in the article “Exclusive Interview with William J. Murray, Defender of Persecuted Christians.
Murray’s answer is fascinating. For him, conservative evangelical churches should be engaged in helping conservative evangelicals to immigrate to America. But they are not doing it.
Yet, liberal and leftist churches are doing it — for their liberal and leftist brothers. And even anti-Christian groups are doing it too — only for their anti-Christian brothers.
Recently, Republican candidate Donald Trump was criticized for his comment about banning Islamic immigration to America. This unnecessary and harmful immigration has received preferential treatment for decades in America’s politics, while Christians, who are preferential victims of Islamic oppressors, have been ignored and forgotten.
To attack Trump, Democratic socialist opponent Hillary Clinton featured Khizr Khan as a Muslim speaker at the Democratic National Convention.
Khan has deep ties to the government of Saudi Arabia and to controversial immigration programs used by him to help Muslim foreigners to essentially buy their way into the United States. In short, he is actively helping his Islamic brothers. But where are the U.S. conservative Christians helping their brothers?
According to the article “Catholic Church Paid Millions in Dollars to Facilitate Immigrant Invasion in U.S.,” a Catholic source says that the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops receives millions in U.S. government grants to provide benefits to Muslim “refugees.” So the Catholic Church is helping the Islamic immigration revolution. In this perspective, it is no wonder that in America most Catholic immigrants, who are conservative, have a consistently leftist voting history. Their leftist behavior does not match their supposedly conservative beliefs.
The invasion of Islamic “refugees” is also benefiting left-wing billionaire George Soros, who, through his Open Society Foundations (OSFs), is influencing the U.S. Supreme Court and the mainstream media to support the immigrant invasion to promote his left-wing causes. The revelation came as a Russian hacker organization released thousands of documents from OSF officials. (Read: Left-Wing Billionaire George Soros and His Plan of Global Chaos.)
This invasion is not new. Little is said about a “refugee” program that has been delivering thousands of Somali Muslims annually to U.S. cities for 33 years. In fact, it was started by Ronald Reagan.
Somalia is a hotbed of Sunni jihad terrorism — the same kind as ISIS. Somalia is home to the notorious al-Qaida affiliate al-Shabab.
Al-Shabab launched massacres against Christians in Kenya last year at a mall and at a university. Dozens of Somali-American “refugees” and children of refugees have been charged over the years with providing material support to al-Shabab, ISIS and other overseas terror groups. More than 40 have left the U.S. since 2007 to join either al-Shabab or the Islamic State in Syria.
Left-wing President Obama has, during his more than seven years in office, approved the resettlement of 47,500 Islamic Somali “refugees” into U.S. communities.
The supposedly right-wing George W. Bush administration brought 49,613 Islamic Somalis to the U.S. over eight years, according to the U.S. State Department’s refugee database. They were resettled by nonprofits such as Catholic Charities, Lutheran Social Services, Church World Services, the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society and the National Association of Evangelicals’ World Relief Corp.
Largely Catholic, Protestant and Jewish organizations are collaborators in this invasion. According to WND (WorldNetDaily), since Reagan in 1983, the U.S. has taken in a total of 132,224 Somalis, 99 percent of whom are Sunni Muslims who observe Shariah law. These Jewish-Catholic-Evangelical organization, with socialist Democrat and conservative Republican administrations, have generally followed the socialist agenda on Islamic immigration to the U.S.
So even Republican and conservative presidents (including Reagan and both Bushes) helped the liberal scheme of massive invasion of Islamic immigrants to America. In contrast, would Democrats and their socialist allies help a conservative plan that included massive immigration of conservative evangelicals to the U.S.?
An immigration policy to bring pro-Israel conservative evangelicals to America would be discriminatory, in the U.S. media’s view, which sees nothing wrong in bringing in anti-Israel radical Muslims.
Pro-Israel conservative evangelicals bring blessing to a nation and anti-Israel Muslims bring curses, because God said about the Jews: “I will bless those who bless you and I will curse those who curse you.” Because of her stupid immigration policies, now America has massive Islamic rallies, in major cities like Chicago, supporting terror groups and protesting Israel.
The original evangelical Americans were pro-Israel and I doubt that they would support the mass immigration of anti-Semites that America is allowing today. Why is America importing thousands and thousands of pro-terror and anti-Israel immigrants? Why are evangelical presidents helping such immigrants?
If conservative evangelical churches in America do not help conservative evangelicals in other nations, who will do it? The U.S. government? It is too busy, under conservative Republican and socialist Democratic presidents, helping Muslims — thousands of them, indeed. In fact, according to WND, Reagan (whom I admire as the most conservative president in recent U.S. history), was the first U.S. president to flood America with Muslim immigrants! It is a nightmare for you to learn that your most admired president did an unthinkable thing.
How can conservatives condemn crypto-Islamic Obama for his immigration policies favoring Muslims when even mega-conservative Reagan was mistaken on it? At least, Obama has been consistent with his crypto-Islamic values. Reagan and the Bushes were not consistent with their Christian evangelical values. If they were, they would have immigration policies favoring evangelicals.
A Brazilian friend, who is an Assemblies of God minister, told me that he wanted to live in America to help conservative evangelicals. He is completely conservative. He has several U.S. conservative evangelical friends… who are unwilling to help him to immigrate to America. He feels their unwillingness, but he does not understand it.
On the other hand, you see liberals in America helping liberals around the world immigrate to America.
You see Muslims in America helping Muslims around the world to immigrate to America.
You see secular Marxists in America helping secular Marxists around the world to immigrate to America.
You see Christian Marxists in America helping Christian Marxists around the world to immigrate to America.
But you do not see conservative Christians in America helping conservative Christians around the world to immigrate to America.
Who will win this war? Those with an ineffectual answer of immigration restrictions or those working for decades to flood America with immigrants hungry for socialist handouts?
Sadly, the latter are already winning and in a few decades America will be remade according to their liberal image and likeness.
The best way to analyze the strength of a people is by their religious power. America, whose republic was founded by a moral people 98% Protestant (and their Protestantism was strong in numbers, virtue and the Bible), is today less than 50% Protestant, and they are losing in numbers and spiritual quality.
The original U.S. Protestants were conservative.
In the past, America was a superpower in the hands of Bible-believing evangelicals. Today, America is not in the hands of conservative evangelicals and the evangelical vacancy in the U.S. government has been filled by a crypto-Islamic man in the White House and by numerous activists opposed to conservative evangelicalism. More vacancies will be filled by Muslims over time. From evangelical superpower to Muslim, socialist and homosexualist superpower. I am pretty sure that the U.S. Founders never envisioned such tragedy for America.
It is obvious that American liberals are flooding America with immigrants who are not Protestant and definitely are not conservative. They are helping their friends and allies.
Why don’t American conservatives help their friends and allies?
Why do only liberals know how to use immigration as a weapon? In their hands, immigration is a weapon of mass cultural destruction to destroy a conservative culture.
Why can’t conservatives use immigration as a weapon of mass cultural destruction to neutralize the liberal weapon of mass cultural destruction and save America and restore her to her original Bible-centered evangelicalism?
Of course, conservative evangelicals can counter the onslaught of liberal immigration policies by taking the Gospel to thousands of Muslim immigrants who have already been brought by Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush and Reagan. But such policies are insane and conservative presidents were not sane to implement them.
Above all, why cannot conservative evangelical churches use immigration as a channel of blessing to their conservative brothers and sisters around the world? Is not this what the Bible teaches us?
“So seize any opportunity the Lord gives you to do good things and be a blessing to everyone, especially those within our faithful family.” (Galatians 6:10 The Voice)
“Whenever we have the opportunity, we have to do what is good for everyone, especially for the family of believers.” (Galatians 6:10 GWV)
“Right now, therefore, every time we get the chance, let us work for the benefit of all, starting with the people closest to us in the community of faith.” (Galatians 6:10 Message)
With information from WND and DailyMail.
Recommended Reading: