Showing posts with label Democrats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Democrats. Show all posts

Vladimir Putin publicly accused by U.S. government of plot to interfere in presidential election against Hillary Clinton and her party


Vladimir Putin publicly accused by U.S. government of plot to interfere in presidential election against Hillary Clinton and her party

By Julio Severo
The U.S. government for the first time on Friday formally accused Russia of a campaign of cyber attacks against the socialist Democratic Party and political organizations connected to the socialist presidential candidate Hillary Clinton ahead of the Nov. 8 presidential election.
Hillary Clinton
In an extraordinary joint public statement, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence said it was confident that Russia’s “senior-most officials” ordered the attacks. (For more information on DHS, see: “Homeland Security: More Insecurity for Christians?” See also: “Homeland Security surveillance detected on Julio Severo website”)
The statement amounts to an accusation that Vladimir Putin ordered interference in the American political system.
The Obama administration’s decision to blame Russia for the attacks is the latest downward turn in Washington’s relations with Moscow, which are under strain over Russia’s actions that are upsetting U.S. interference in Syria and Ukraine.
“This is a huge deal,” said Michael Morell, the former director of the Central Intelligence Agency. “I can’t think of any time in our history where we have blamed another government for trying to interfere with our elections. ... This is unprecedented across the board.”
Morell has publicly endorsed Hillary and Muslims in CIA. He has characterized Trump as Putin’s agent.
Yet, contrary to what Morell said, it is not “unprecedented.” Some weeks ago DCLeaks, a group of hackers, exposed the immensity of the Soros-funded Left’s campaign that included Soros plans to “counter Russian foreign policy and subvert traditional Russian values.” Soros is a Hillary supporter.
The Obama administration and its agencies have had no interest in denouncing Soros, a U.S. citizen, and his campaigns to undermine Russian policies and values.
As ever, the U.S. government is very fast and comfortable with pointing fingers, blaming, accusing and mocking Russia. For what? For exposing Hillary, who is pro-abortion and pro-sodomy and is the only candidate formally supported by the U.S. Communist Party. Yet, 15 years after over 3,000 Americans were killed in the Saudi Islamic terror attack on the World Trade Center, the U.S. is not able to point any finger at Islam or Saudi Arabia. On the contrary, Bush, Obama and Hillary have said that “Islam is a religion of peace” —perhaps because they enjoy treating Islam peacefully. This feeling is not reciprocal.
They have never dared to provoke Islam and Saudi Arabia the way they provoke Russia, even though Islam and Saudi Arabia have showed very clearly that they are against the Christian America. Russia? Russians have showed very clearly that they are against Hillary and they stand with Trump, who has antagonized Muslims and Saudi Arabia. Is this bad?
U.S. intelligence officials concluded weeks ago that the Russian government was conducting or orchestrating cyber attacks against the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, to disrupt or discredit Hillary and her campaign.
High-level officials in Hillary’s party applauded Obama’s decision to formally accuse Russian hackers of political cyber attacks against Hillary’s organizations.
Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein said in a statement that “[t]he administration’s acknowledgement that Russian intelligence agencies are attempting to influence the U.S. election and undermine public confidence conveys the seriousness of the threat.”
Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff said in a statement on Friday that “I applaud the administration’s decision to publicly name Russia as the source of hacks into U.S. political institutions.”
If they had been told that the nation behind the cyber attacks was Saudi Arabia, all of them, including Obama and Hillary, would apologize for provoking hard feelings in the Saudis. The disparity of U.S. attitude toward Saudis and Russians is blatantly shocking. Saudi Arabia kills Christians and homosexuals. Russia does not kill homosexuals, but bans homosexual propaganda to children and regulates religious activity outside its official Orthodox Christian Church — just as Israel regulates religious activity outside its official Judaism. Whom the U.S. government and press systematically criticize and condemn? Saudi Arabia? No. Russia.
The Democratic National Committee publicly disclosed intrusions into its systems in June, blaming Russia for the attacks.
Only organizations connected to Hillary were attacked. No organization connected to Donald Trump was attacked.
U.S. government officials emphasized that it would be difficult for Russian hackers to alter the results of the Nov. 8 election because each U.S. state runs its own election system. Even so, a senior U.S. official said the Obama administration is considering retaliatory steps against Russia.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov dismissed the U.S. government statement but didn’t deny Russia’s involvement.
“Every day there are tens of thousands of attacks on Putin’s website. Many of the attacks can be traced to the U.S.,” Peskov was quoted as telling the Interfax news agency. “We’re not blaming the White House or Langley every time,” he added, referring to the Virginia city where the CIA is based.
Friday’s official accusation of Russian involvement adds to campaign-year fodder stoked this summer by Donald Trump, who encouraged Russia to find — and make public — missing emails supposedly deleted by Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton.
“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Trump said in July. He referred to emails on Hillary’s private server that she said she deleted. These messages involved the State Department affairs and their use in a private server constitutes crime. But Hillary has been spared prosecution.
After all, who is the criminal? Hillary, who has lied about her criminal abuse of official government messages? Or Russia, which is exposing her secret scandals, including scandals of her political organizations?
Could the accusations against Russia be a smokescreen to deflect attention from Hillary’s crimes?
With information from DailyMail, Reuters and Associated Press.
Recommended Reading:

Immigration: A Weapon of Mass Cultural Destruction in Liberal Hands


Immigration: A Weapon of Mass Cultural Destruction in Liberal Hands

By Julio Severo
It is a fact that conservatives in the United States are losing the culture war mainly through a massive immigration facilitated for decades by liberal policies. Democrats, who are essentially socialists, have a comfortable upper hand on immigration.
The typical answer from U.S. conservatives is to restrict some immigration. But, by then, America has already been flooded by immigrants who are largely contributing to the liberal project of cultural hegemony in the U.S.
By now, U.S. conservatives should have noticed and concluded that if liberals are winning by immigration, they should also use the same methods. Fire against fire.
If liberals are flooding America with Muslims and others who are helping their project, conservatives should also work a plan to flood America with immigrants. Not any immigrant, but real conservative immigrants. Ann Coulter noted that many Latin American Catholic immigrants, who are pro-life, are easily misled by Democrats and their socialist handouts. Usually, they love pro-life values. But they will vote for any candidate who gives them handouts, regardless of whether he is pro-abortion or not. This is not real conservatism.
To fit the ever-changing liberal population profile induced by mass immigration, conservatives and Republicans are increasingly espousing liberal ideas, methods and policies. Immigration is changing the way conservatives and Republicans think and behave politically. Because of the huge army of immigrants serving the Democratic Party, Republicans and their stances, especially their actions, are increasingly less conservative, while Democrats behave increasingly more liberal.
Conservatives who do not embrace the relativistic way of liberals suffer the consequences of irresponsible immigration aimed at making the Left, not America, strong.
An American-Jewish friend of mine told me that she lives in a very conservative county in Denver, which is receiving numerous Muslim immigrants, who are politically labeled as “refugees” by the Left. She said that UNC (University of Northern Colorado) began 2 years ago providing Halal (Islamic food) in all their cafeterias and that federal funding is linked to both immigration and transgender bathrooms. “So if the school districts want the federal funding they must abide by the laws,” she said.
Dr. William J. Murray, a former Marxist who today denounces the Marxist ideology, read my article, agreed and said, “Yes, conservatives helping conservatives immigrate would be good but… There are very few actual conservative churches left in America. Short answer: Good idea but the church will not help.”
Murray, who is the founder and director of Religious Freedom Coalition(a Washington DC-based Christian organization that helps persecuted Christians), also said, “We have done all we can to bring Christians in from Syria… this is the result: 99% of Syrians this year allowed in by Obama are Muslims with 97% being Sunni Muslims. Keep in mind that it is the Sunni Muslims who are responsible for 9-11 and every act of terror including Ft. Hood, San Bernardino, Orland, Paris, Brussels and Nice just to name a few.”
Murray was featured in my blog in 2015 in the article “Exclusive Interview with William J. Murray, Defender of Persecuted Christians.
Murray’s answer is fascinating. For him, conservative evangelical churches should be engaged in helping conservative evangelicals to immigrate to America. But they are not doing it.
Yet, liberal and leftist churches are doing it — for their liberal and leftist brothers. And even anti-Christian groups are doing it too — only for their anti-Christian brothers.
Recently, Republican candidate Donald Trump was criticized for his comment about banning Islamic immigration to America. This unnecessary and harmful immigration has received preferential treatment for decades in America’s politics, while Christians, who are preferential victims of Islamic oppressors, have been ignored and forgotten.
To attack Trump, Democratic socialist opponent Hillary Clinton featured Khizr Khan as a Muslim speaker at the Democratic National Convention.
Khan has deep ties to the government of Saudi Arabia and to controversial immigration programs used by him to help Muslim foreigners to essentially buy their way into the United States. In short, he is actively helping his Islamic brothers. But where are the U.S. conservative Christians helping their brothers?
According to the article “Catholic Church Paid Millions in Dollars to Facilitate Immigrant Invasion in U.S.,” a Catholic source says that the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops receives millions in U.S. government grants to provide benefits to Muslim “refugees.” So the Catholic Church is helping the Islamic immigration revolution. In this perspective, it is no wonder that in America most Catholic immigrants, who are conservative, have a consistently leftist voting history. Their leftist behavior does not match their supposedly conservative beliefs.
The invasion of Islamic “refugees” is also benefiting left-wing billionaire George Soros, who, through his Open Society Foundations (OSFs), is influencing the U.S. Supreme Court and the mainstream media to support the immigrant invasion to promote his left-wing causes. The revelation came as a Russian hacker organization released thousands of documents from OSF officials. (Read: Left-Wing Billionaire George Soros and His Plan of Global Chaos.)
This invasion is not new. Little is said about a “refugee” program that has been delivering thousands of Somali Muslims annually to U.S. cities for 33 years. In fact, it was started by Ronald Reagan.
Somalia is a hotbed of Sunni jihad terrorism — the same kind as ISIS. Somalia is home to the notorious al-Qaida affiliate al-Shabab.
Al-Shabab launched massacres against Christians in Kenya last year at a mall and at a university. Dozens of Somali-American “refugees” and children of refugees have been charged over the years with providing material support to al-Shabab, ISIS and other overseas terror groups. More than 40 have left the U.S. since 2007 to join either al-Shabab or the Islamic State in Syria.
Left-wing President Obama has, during his more than seven years in office, approved the resettlement of 47,500 Islamic Somali “refugees” into U.S. communities.
The supposedly right-wing George W. Bush administration brought 49,613 Islamic Somalis to the U.S. over eight years, according to the U.S. State Department’s refugee database. They were resettled by nonprofits such as Catholic Charities, Lutheran Social Services, Church World Services, the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society and the National Association of Evangelicals’ World Relief Corp.
Largely Catholic, Protestant and Jewish organizations are collaborators in this invasion. According to WND (WorldNetDaily), since Reagan in 1983, the U.S. has taken in a total of 132,224 Somalis, 99 percent of whom are Sunni Muslims who observe Shariah law. These Jewish-Catholic-Evangelical organization, with socialist Democrat and conservative Republican administrations, have generally followed the socialist agenda on Islamic immigration to the U.S.
So even Republican and conservative presidents (including Reagan and both Bushes) helped the liberal scheme of massive invasion of Islamic immigrants to America. In contrast, would Democrats and their socialist allies help a conservative plan that included massive immigration of conservative evangelicals to the U.S.?
An immigration policy to bring pro-Israel conservative evangelicals to America would be discriminatory, in the U.S. media’s view, which sees nothing wrong in bringing in anti-Israel radical Muslims.
Pro-Israel conservative evangelicals bring blessing to a nation and anti-Israel Muslims bring curses, because God said about the Jews: “I will bless those who bless you and I will curse those who curse you.” Because of her stupid immigration policies, now America has massive Islamic rallies, in major cities like Chicago, supporting terror groups and protesting Israel.
The original evangelical Americans were pro-Israel and I doubt that they would support the mass immigration of anti-Semites that America is allowing today. Why is America importing thousands and thousands of pro-terror and anti-Israel immigrants? Why are evangelical presidents helping such immigrants?
If conservative evangelical churches in America do not help conservative evangelicals in other nations, who will do it? The U.S. government? It is too busy, under conservative Republican and socialist Democratic presidents, helping Muslims — thousands of them, indeed. In fact, according to WND, Reagan (whom I admire as the most conservative president in recent U.S. history), was the first U.S. president to flood America with Muslim immigrants! It is a nightmare for you to learn that your most admired president did an unthinkable thing.
How can conservatives condemn crypto-Islamic Obama for his immigration policies favoring Muslims when even mega-conservative Reagan was mistaken on it? At least, Obama has been consistent with his crypto-Islamic values. Reagan and the Bushes were not consistent with their Christian evangelical values. If they were, they would have immigration policies favoring evangelicals.
A Brazilian friend, who is an Assemblies of God minister, told me that he wanted to live in America to help conservative evangelicals. He is completely conservative. He has several U.S. conservative evangelical friends… who are unwilling to help him to immigrate to America. He feels their unwillingness, but he does not understand it.
On the other hand, you see liberals in America helping liberals around the world immigrate to America.
You see Muslims in America helping Muslims around the world to immigrate to America.
You see secular Marxists in America helping secular Marxists around the world to immigrate to America.
You see Christian Marxists in America helping Christian Marxists around the world to immigrate to America.
But you do not see conservative Christians in America helping conservative Christians around the world to immigrate to America.
Who will win this war? Those with an ineffectual answer of immigration restrictions or those working for decades to flood America with immigrants hungry for socialist handouts?
Sadly, the latter are already winning and in a few decades America will be remade according to their liberal image and likeness.
The best way to analyze the strength of a people is by their religious power. America, whose republic was founded by a moral people 98% Protestant (and their Protestantism was strong in numbers, virtue and the Bible), is today less than 50% Protestant, and they are losing in numbers and spiritual quality.
The original U.S. Protestants were conservative.
In the past, America was a superpower in the hands of Bible-believing evangelicals. Today, America is not in the hands of conservative evangelicals and the evangelical vacancy in the U.S. government has been filled by a crypto-Islamic man in the White House and by numerous activists opposed to conservative evangelicalism. More vacancies will be filled by Muslims over time. From evangelical superpower to Muslim, socialist and homosexualist superpower. I am pretty sure that the U.S. Founders never envisioned such tragedy for America.
It is obvious that American liberals are flooding America with immigrants who are not Protestant and definitely are not conservative. They are helping their friends and allies.
Why don’t American conservatives help their friends and allies?
Why do only liberals know how to use immigration as a weapon? In their hands, immigration is a weapon of mass cultural destruction to destroy a conservative culture.
Why can’t conservatives use immigration as a weapon of mass cultural destruction to neutralize the liberal weapon of mass cultural destruction and save America and restore her to her original Bible-centered evangelicalism?
Of course, conservative evangelicals can counter the onslaught of liberal immigration policies by taking the Gospel to thousands of Muslim immigrants who have already been brought by Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush and Reagan. But such policies are insane and conservative presidents were not sane to implement them.
Above all, why cannot conservative evangelical churches use immigration as a channel of blessing to their conservative brothers and sisters around the world? Is not this what the Bible teaches us?
“So seize any opportunity the Lord gives you to do good things and be a blessing to everyone, especially those within our faithful family.” (Galatians 6:10 The Voice)
“Whenever we have the opportunity, we have to do what is good for everyone, especially for the family of believers.” (Galatians 6:10 GWV)
“Right now, therefore, every time we get the chance, let us work for the benefit of all, starting with the people closest to us in the community of faith.” (Galatians 6:10 Message)
With information from WND and DailyMail.
Recommended Reading: