In Hollywood’s Blacklist: Allah Is Loving, But Non-Acceptance of Homosexuality Leads to Violence, Sadism and Terror

By Julio Severo

Usually, in Islamic cultures fathers kill homosexual sons. Even in the Western culture, they kill them. For example, a FoxNews headlinesaid, “Los Angeles father allegedly killed son because he was gay.” This father was Shehada Issa, a Muslim man.

Yet, because in Hollywood reality makes no sense, in an episode titled “The Djinn” in the American crime thriller television series The Blacklist, the script was fantastically unreal. A Muslim businessman in the U.S. had been kidnapped, and while the U.S. police, even the FBI, are searching for him, no one knows that he is imprisoned in the bedroom of his alleged daughter Nasim, whose fantasy is to torture and kill him.

In a point, with her father bound and tortured, Nasim said, “Allah teaches us forgiveness.” This was the only mention of Allah in the movie: a loving god who supposedly teaches that instead violence, his adherents should practice love and forgiveness. But this is an artistic Allah made in USA, because the real non-forgiving Allah, who teaches his adherents to kill 100,000 Christians a year, makes no sense to politically correct minds.

So Allah needed to be reinvented by Hollywood to have an American fictitious image of what it is not in the Islamic cultures, and also to be a part of a money-making machine for a Hollywood that turns real nightmares into profitable fantasies.

Then Nasim adds, “But some things are unforgivable.”

It is obvious that for the real Allah, a Muslim accepting Jesus Christ as his Savior is “unforgivable.” But what is “unforgivable” for Hollywood and its Allah? Non-acceptance of homosexuality!

Emerges the criminal-hero Raymond “Red” Reddington (played by actor James Spader) and Nasim says to him: “What do you want?”

Reddington: “To offer my sympathies.”

Next, in one of the greatest “moral” sermons in The Blacklist, and perhaps in all the Hollywood history, he lectured how Nasim had been born a man, but his father, against his will, made him into a “woman” to protect his family from disgrace. The Reddington character uses and abuses the word “choice” in a perverse Hollywoodian way.

“Choice” is a very misleading word in Hollywood and America. You are a criminal in America if you force a woman to abort her unborn baby. But if she chooses to abort by her free will, it is not a crime. In fact, you are labeled a criminal if you try to hinder her from killing her baby!

Choice, Allah, Islam and homosexuality are sacred cows in the script, never to be mentioned negatively. Let us see their conversation:

Nasim: I know who you are.

Reddington: And I know who you are, Nasim. What a beautiful name. It means “breeze” in Farsi. But you weren’t born Nasim. You were born Nasir — “the victorious.” How ironic. But a boy. A perfectly healthy boy.

Another character says to Nasim: We know you’re The Djinn.

Reddington: And this must be your father. The butcher. Tell me, Bahram, was it so horrific to discover that your 19-year-old son, your eldest son, was gay? So horrific that you forced him against his will to go under the knife, change his gender, to give you a daughter instead of your son, who is gay?

Bahram, Nasim’s father, shakily: Clerics accept… People can get trapped in the body of the wrong sex. The law says…

Nasim: I wasn’t trapped. I liked my body. I liked men.

Bahram: I wanted to protect you, Nasim. They could have killed you.

Reddington: For being gay. They’re so homophobic that being gay is a hideous crime, but chopping off a man’s penis isn’t? Honestly, is it just me, or is the human race, armed with religion, poisoned by prejudice, and absolutely frantic with hatred and fear, galloping pell-mell back to the dark ages? Who on earth is hurt by a little girl going to school or a child being gay? Let’s be frank, Bahram. You didn’t change your son to protect him. You changed him because he disgusted you.

According to his Hollywood script, Nasim became “The Djinn,” a sadistic criminal who helps fulfill revenge fantasies through terroristic kidnappings, not because of Allah, but because his father did not accept his homosexuality. Islam is innocent in the violence of Nasim and his father.

According to Muslim demonology, the Djinn is one of a class of spirits that inhabit the earth, assume human and animal forms and exercise supernatural power. Is it any wonder that The Blacklist episode titled “The Djinn” seemed inspired by demons?

According to the Hollywood view inspired by demons, it is not Islam, or Mohammed or the Koran which leads Muslims to terrorism. It is non-acceptance of homosexuality!

Non-acceptance of homosexuality leads people to violence, sadism and terrorism — in the evil world of Hollywood. The script made it clear that its Hollywoodian Allah had no role in the violence by its Islamic adherents.

In real life is very different. The majority of Muslims in the East consider harsh treatment of homosexuals to be perfectly justified.

Textbooks for Islamic Studies, officially used by the Saudi Ministry of Education, say:

“Homosexuality is one of the most disgusting sins and greatest crimes.... It is a vile perversion that goes against sound nature, and is one of the most corrupting and hideous sins.... The punishment for homosexuality is death… [the perpetrator] is to be burned with fire. It has also been said that he should be stoned, or thrown from a high place.”

Saudi Arabia, a U.S. ally, is the capital of Islam in the world.

Ten Muslim nations officially impose the death penalty for homosexuals. They are Saudi Arabia, Iran, Mauritania, Nigeria, Pakistan, Somalia, Sudan, United Arab Emirates, Yemen and some states in Malaysia.

Other Muslim countries have no official death penalty for homosexuals, but homosexuals are murdered anyway by police and the population.

In the real Islamic world Nasim would have, by force or not, been given no opportunity to live. Homosexuality is punished with death in Islam. So the sermon given by the criminal-hero Reddington about not giving free choice to homosexuals is not about Islam, which in real life kills homosexuals, but which in Hollywood has a loving Allah. It is about Christianity.

Hollywood, which fears to treat Islam as a religion controlling people and leading them to violence, feels free to make this negative depiction of Christianity. For example, in the “Sir Crispin Crandall” episode, The Blacklist has a scene where the wicked CIA director interrogated a criminal by using the Bible. He said, showing the pictures of the criminal’s children,

 “Are you acquainted with the Bible, Mr. Karpos? I am. At one point, I actually considered the priesthood. Can you imagine? There’s a passage — Exodus 20:5-6. ‘For I, the Lord thy God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquities of the fathers upon the children.’ We wouldn’t want that. Would we, Mr. Karpos?”

After the “veiled” threat against his children, the criminal revealed all the information the CIA director wanted!

Can you imagine Hollywood depicting a CIA director threatening violence against the children of someone by using the Koran? Hollywood is able to protect Islam and homosexuality at the same time, but not the evangelical Christianity that founded the United States.

Actually, people are controlled by ideologies, which lead them to violence. Hollywood is representative of a liberal ideology which protects violent Islam, portrays Christianity as violent and depicts homosexuality as a good and even compulsory “choice,” including for children.

Hollywood fantasies violently rape truth for the sake of its own profitable lies.

The Hollywoodian Allah forgives and accepts homosexuality. But for Hollywood, non-acceptance of homosexuality is an unforgivable “crime.”

Hollywood is philandering with Allah at the expense of truth, reality and the evangelical Christianity that founded America.

Often the cold-blood Reddington kills other criminals. I wonder what he would do to George Washington, the first U.S. president, who expelled a soldier for homosexuality.

Would Hollywood depict Washington as a criminal to be lectured and even killed by a Reddington?

Would Hollywood depict him as a man in need to learn from the Hollywoodian Allah how to forgive his homosexual soldier?

Would Hollywood depict him as a demon Djinn for his opposition to homosexuality?

Anyway, The Blacklist will never do it to Islam, the Koran and Saudi Arabia. Only Christians and the Bible are in the Hollywood’s blacklist.

What is Hollywood waiting to put Washington in its blacklist?

Portuguese version of this article: Na lista negra de Hollywood: Alá é amoroso, mas a não aceitação da homossexualidade leva à violência, sadismo e terrorismo

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

George Washington: “It is the duty of all nations to acknowledge God”

Palestinian Gays Want World Boycotts against Israel

United States: between Gayland and Mohammedland

Homosexualist billionaire Peter Thiel’s influence grows in Washington as Trump names him for his transition team

Ion Mihai Pacepa and Disinformation

By Julio Severo

In the book “Disinformation” (published by WND in 2013), Ion Mihai Pacepa offers his view on a Liberation Theology and Islamic terrorism exclusively created by the KGB and a Nazism and Soviet Marxism as “brothers.”

Ion Pacepa

He offers his view as a former KGB agent today under CIA protection.

As soon as his book was published, I acquired it. Before reading it, I had already published some articles on him. But after reading the book, I was surprised at his exceedingly simplistic conclusions.

Jewish Issue and a Supposed Equality Between Nazism and Soviet Marxism

Pacepa says that Nazism and Soviet Marxism were absolutely similar. In fact, there were similar points but as any historian knows and as every Israel-loving Christian knows, the most important issue in the 2nd World War was the Holocaust that Nazis committed against the Jews, annihilating 6 million of them. In this specific issue, was there equality between Nazism and Soviet Marxism?

What History records is that while the Nazi army annihilated the Jews throughout Europe, the Soviet Union’s Red Army consisted of thousands of Jews, who helped annihilate Nazism. While the Gestapo (the Nazi secret police) relentless persecuted the Jews, NKVD, the KGB predecessor, was founded by the Soviet Jew Genrikh Yagoda, considered the greatest Jewish murderer in the 20th century, according to an Israeli newspaper.

So as far as the 2nd World War Jews are concerned, Nazism and Soviet Marxism were in opposed sides: Nazism was a total enemy of the Jews while the Soviet Marxism was a friend. Even though this in no way excuses the atrocities of the Soviet Union, it freed the first Nazi concentration camp and it was the first nation to acknowledge officially at the United Nations the modern State of Israel in 1948.

Hitler’s anti-Jewish hatred found no match in the Soviet Union, but in a powerful U.S. capitalist of his time.

My article “Hitler’s Strident Anti-Marxism,” based on the views of Henry Ford (a capitalist magnate of the automobile industry) and Hitler, brings literal mentions by them and shows that their hatred of the Soviet Marxism was derived from the fact that the Jews had a certain control of the communist revolution in Russia. You can see more information in my article “Jewish Issues: A Clarification to Christians about Their Perception on the Jews.”

Is Liberation Theology a KGB’s Daughter?

In his book Pacepa insists that KGB is the mother of Liberation Theology. But both U.S. and Brazilian Catholics dispute Pacepa. (Brazil is the largest Catholic nation in the world, heavily affected by Liberation Theology.) U.S. Catholic author John L. Allen, of Crux, said:

“Catholic Archbishop Hélder Câmara of Olinda and Recife in Brazil didn’t have to be ‘maneuvered.’ He was already on board with liberation theology before anyone in Moscow knew it was stirring. That’s not to say the KGB didn’t do whatever it could to support leftist movements in Latin America critical of capitalism and the United States. It would be surprising if they hadn’t, given the zero/sum Cold War logic that anything that seemed to hurt one side benefited the other. In that sense, Pacepa is likely correct about the KGB strategy, but may be giving the agency too much credit for its results.”

Helder Camara, who founded the National Conference of Bishops of Brazil and is the patron of the Brazilian Catholic Left, is in process of sainthood in the Vatican.

The Plínio Corrêa de Oliveira Institute, a Brazilian Catholic institution known for its conservative stances, also disputed the exaggerated conclusions in Pacepa’s book, by posting the article titled “Liberation Theology, a KGB Invention? That Is Way Too Simple... ”

To say, as Pacepa said, that the KGB created Liberation Theology equates saying that CIA created the Pentecostal and charismatic movements, even though some very radical Catholics declare just so. During the Cold War, the KGB supported sectors in the Catholic Church connected to Liberation Theology while CIA supported conservative Pentecostal movements that were opposed to Liberation Theology. See my article “The Religious War between CIA and KGB in Latin America.” I have attended Pentecostal and charismatic churches. Does it mean that I am CIA child? By no means.

Prominent Catholic website National Catholic Register, in an article written by the Catholic journalist Victor Gaetan, rebutted Pacepa and his book by showing that there is disinformative content in his declarations. See the article “Disinformation” and a Dubious Source.

Catholic theologian Malachi Martin shows several Catholic ecclesiastical leaders who, before the KGB’s birth, promoted Liberation Theology.

The big challenge, therefore, is to read Pacepa’s book knowing how to distinguish between what is real and imaginary, filtrating what seems showy and impossible to prove. It is suspicious, for example, the fact that Pacepa is praised by CIA — a praise cheerfully recorded in his book. Opposition to the KGB, for a conservative, does not mean automatic support to CIA. To receive praises from CIA (headed today by a Muslim), or from the KGB, is a disadvantage, making the praised individual worthy of mistrust.

Is Modern Islamic Terror a KGB Creation?

According to information from WND itself, which published originally the Pacepa book, the U.S. government secretly sent many supplies of weapons to Syrian rebels (largely Islamic terrorists connected to al-Qaeda) who have been raping, torturing and slaughtering Christians in Syria. CIA played a major role in this scheme. In fact, WND accuses Hillary Clinton of having helped create ISIS, which has slaughtered thousands of Christians in the Middle East.

Besides, it is known that CIA gave billions of dollars to create al-Qaeda in the late 1970s, in a scheme to strengthen and use Islamic terror to overturn the Soviet Union. But the scheme was turned upside down when one of the CIA Islamic agents, Saudi Osama bin Laden, for some reason rebelled himself against the U.S. CIA and its former agent played a crucial role in the strengthening of the modern Islamic terror. But Pacepa seems to ignore all of this, even though he presents himself as an expert on Islamic terror. He insists in attributing 100 percent blame on the KGB.

Pacepa, who supposedly occupied so prominent post in the KGB that it allowed him to know at length the CIA involvement in the fomentation of the international Islamic terror, in his book he pretends that he has no such knowledge, or he hides it in order to be in the favor and privileges of CIA.

I examined his book “Disinformation” and I did not find any criticism of CIA and no mention of the fact that CIA had and has undeniable participation in the modern Islamic terror. In fact, the current CIA director is a Muslim, having converted to this murderous religion when he was in Saudi Arabia. Even so, to CIA Pacepa has in store only praises; to the KGB, criticism. Why not, for fairness, criticize both?

In “Disinformation,” Pacepa tells that his protection, identity and other personal issues are under CIA responsibility. The introduction of his book was written by James Woolsey, a former CIA director. In this point, some could question if the Pacepa book denounces disinformation or is a tool of disinformation.

By following his own exaggerated conclusions, Pacepa has more than enough reasons to say that the U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump is a “KGB agent.”

In fact, a former CIA director has said just so. He also said that he is going to vote for pro-Islam Hillary Clinton and he praised the fact that since 9/11 the CIA’s Counterterrorism Center was headed by a Muslim for over ten years. The current CIA director is Muslim. Former U.S. President George H.W. Bush, also a former CIA director, said that he is going to vote for Hillary.

If this scandal were connected to KGB, Pacepa would be exposing it and yelling.

Why his silence?

Portuguese version of this article: Ion Mihai Pacepa e desinformação

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

The Religious War between CIA and KGB in Latin America

Hitler’s Strident Anti-Marxism

Olavo de Carvalho and His Nonsense on Trump and Russia

A Brazilian Neocon?

Siding with the “religion of peace”: Obama, Bush, Brzezinski…

Liberation Theology, a KGB Invention? That Is Way Too Simple...

Is Trump a KGB Agent?

Vladimir Putin publicly accused by U.S. government of plot to interfere in presidential election against Hillary Clinton and her party

By Julio Severo

The U.S. government for the first time on Friday formally accused Russia of a campaign of cyber attacks against the socialist Democratic Party and political organizations connected to the socialist presidential candidate Hillary Clinton ahead of the Nov. 8 presidential election.

Hillary Clinton

In an extraordinary joint public statement, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence said it was confident that Russia’s “senior-most officials” ordered the attacks. (For more information on DHS, see: “Homeland Security: More Insecurity for Christians?” See also: “Homeland Security surveillance detected on Julio Severo website”)

The statement amounts to an accusation that Vladimir Putin ordered interference in the American political system.

The Obama administration’s decision to blame Russia for the attacks is the latest downward turn in Washington’s relations with Moscow, which are under strain over Russia’s actions that are upsetting U.S. interference in Syria and Ukraine.

“This is a huge deal,” said Michael Morell, the former director of the Central Intelligence Agency. “I can’t think of any time in our history where we have blamed another government for trying to interfere with our elections. ... This is unprecedented across the board.”

Morell has publicly endorsed Hillary and Muslims in CIA. He has characterized Trump as Putin’s agent.

Yet, contrary to what Morell said, it is not “unprecedented.” Some weeks ago DCLeaks, a group of hackers, exposed the immensity of the Soros-funded Left’s campaign that included Soros plans to “counter Russian foreign policy and subvert traditional Russian values.” Soros is a Hillary supporter.

The Obama administration and its agencies have had no interest in denouncing Soros, a U.S. citizen, and his campaigns to undermine Russian policies and values.

As ever, the U.S. government is very fast and comfortable with pointing fingers, blaming, accusing and mocking Russia. For what? For exposing Hillary, who is pro-abortion and pro-sodomy and is the only candidate formally supported by the U.S. Communist Party. Yet, 15 years after over 3,000 Americans were killed in the Saudi Islamic terror attack on the World Trade Center, the U.S. is not able to point any finger at Islam or Saudi Arabia. On the contrary, Bush, Obama and Hillary have said that “Islam is a religion of peace” —perhaps because they enjoy treating Islam peacefully. This feeling is not reciprocal.

They have never dared to provoke Islam and Saudi Arabia the way they provoke Russia, even though Islam and Saudi Arabia have showed very clearly that they are against the Christian America. Russia? Russians have showed very clearly that they are against Hillary and they stand with Trump, who has antagonized Muslims and Saudi Arabia. Is this bad?

U.S. intelligence officials concluded weeks ago that the Russian government was conducting or orchestrating cyber attacks against the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, to disrupt or discredit Hillary and her campaign.

High-level officials in Hillary’s party applauded Obama’s decision to formally accuse Russian hackers of political cyber attacks against Hillary’s organizations.

Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein said in a statement that “[t]he administration’s acknowledgement that Russian intelligence agencies are attempting to influence the U.S. election and undermine public confidence conveys the seriousness of the threat.”

Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff said in a statement on Friday that “I applaud the administration’s decision to publicly name Russia as the source of hacks into U.S. political institutions.”

If they had been told that the nation behind the cyber attacks was Saudi Arabia, all of them, including Obama and Hillary, would apologize for provoking hard feelings in the Saudis. The disparity of U.S. attitude toward Saudis and Russians is blatantly shocking. Saudi Arabia kills Christians and homosexuals. Russia does not kill homosexuals, but bans homosexual propaganda to children and regulates religious activity outside its official Orthodox Christian Church — just as Israel regulates religious activity outside its official Judaism. Whom the U.S. government and press systematically criticize and condemn? Saudi Arabia? No. Russia.

The Democratic National Committee publicly disclosed intrusions into its systems in June, blaming Russia for the attacks.

Only organizations connected to Hillary were attacked. No organization connected to Donald Trump was attacked.

U.S. government officials emphasized that it would be difficult for Russian hackers to alter the results of the Nov. 8 election because each U.S. state runs its own election system. Even so, a senior U.S. official said the Obama administration is considering retaliatory steps against Russia.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov dismissed the U.S. government statement but didn’t deny Russia’s involvement.

“Every day there are tens of thousands of attacks on Putin’s website. Many of the attacks can be traced to the U.S.,” Peskov was quoted as telling the Interfax news agency. “We’re not blaming the White House or Langley every time,” he added, referring to the Virginia city where the CIA is based.

Friday’s official accusation of Russian involvement adds to campaign-year fodder stoked this summer by Donald Trump, who encouraged Russia to find — and make public — missing emails supposedly deleted by Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton.

“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Trump said in July. He referred to emails on Hillary’s private server that she said she deleted. These messages involved the State Department affairs and their use in a private server constitutes crime. But Hillary has been spared prosecution.

After all, who is the criminal? Hillary, who has lied about her criminal abuse of official government messages? Or Russia, which is exposing her secret scandals, including scandals of her political organizations?

Could the accusations against Russia be a smokescreen to deflect attention from Hillary’s crimes?

With information from DailyMail, Reuters and Associated Press.

Portuguese version of this article: Vladimir Putin publicamente acusado pelo governo dos EUA de conspiração para interferir na eleição presidencial contra Hillary Clinton e seu partido

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Ronald Reagan: A Christian Example against Communism

Trump, Obama, Hillary and NATO

Olavo de Carvalho and His Nonsense on Trump and Russia

A Brazilian Neocon?

Left-Wing Billionaire George Soros and His Plan of Global Chaos

Top Anti-Russia Journalist Presents a Dossier Suggesting Trump May Be a Russian Agent

Former CIA director endorses Hillary Clinton, supports Muslims in CIA and characterizes Trump as Putin’s agent

A Trap for Trump

Russia Suspected in Cyber Attack on Campaign of Pro-Sodomy Hillary Clinton

Trump and the Pope: a Right-Wing Populist (Today) Clashing with a Left-Wing Populist

Putin Loves Hillary!

Is Trump a KGB Agent?

9/11 and the Coward Killing by Muslims

By Julio Severo

Today is the day when 15 years ago the United States suffered the biggest Islamic terror attack in its history. Over 3,000 innocent Americans were cowardly killed.

It should be sadly remembered also that after 9/11 U.S President George W. Bush visited a mosque to say that “Islam is a religion of peace.”

Besides, even knowing that the terrorists were Saudis, he did not invade and attack Saudi Arabia. He invaded Iraq, which was made into a scapegoat to save the Saudi king.

Bush did a good pro-life work. But, about Islam, he was not different from Obama: Both treated Islam as a religion of peace. Apparently, Bush’s glorification of Islam as a peaceful ideology made way for the first U.S. president with a full Islamic name: Barack Hussein Obama.

Bush’s unnecessary invasion of Iraq provoked untold suffering to the old Iraq Christian community, which was reduced from over 2,000,000 to less than 400,000. Bush could have received those persecuted Christians as refugees in the United States — persecuted by Muslims enraged over his war. But, instead he received thousands and thousands of Islamic “refugees.”

Who cares about Christians? Not the U.S. government, which provokes wars that bring persecution to them and, as Pilate, washes its hands.

More Iraq Christians were killed in the hands of the followers of the religion of peace, as a result of the U.S. invasion of Iraq, than Americans were killed in the hands of those followers in 9/11.

Portuguese version of this article: O 11 de Setembro e a Matança Covarde Feita por Muçulmanos

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Exclusive Interview with William J. Murray, Defender of Persecuted Christians

Siding with the “religion of peace”: Obama, Bush, Brzezinski…

Christian Persecution Follows US, UK and France in Kosovo, Libya, Iraq and Syria

Confirmed: U.S. Chief Facilitator of Christian Persecution

Why Does Christian Persecution Get Worse In Every Country The U.S. “Liberates”?